Vaccine resistant, more lethal strain of pandemic H1N1?

Influenza viruses are constantly mutating. When large numbers of the hosts become immune to a particular strain either through exposure or vaccination, selection favors the spread of a new strain. This new strain may or may not be more lethal than the one it replaces.

There is some evidence suggesting that a new strain of pandemic H1N1 may be spreading. There is limited evidence suggesting that it may be more lethal than the current dominant strain.

From Barr et al. (2010) [hat-tip, Pixie]:

… a genetically distinct variant containing several signature amino acid changes in both the HA and NA genes has emerged in Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, coinciding with the winter influenza season in the latter two countries.

[snip]

It remains to be seen whether this variant will continue to predominate for the rest of the influenza season in Oceania and in other parts of the southern hemisphere and then spread to the northern hemisphere or merely die out. Already this variant virus has been associated with several vaccine breakthroughs in teenagers and adults vaccinated in 2010 with monovalent pandemic influenza vaccine as well as a number of fatal cases from whom the variant virus was isolated.

There is enough data presented in this paper to warrent steps to produce a vaccine against this new strain. Public health authorities would be ill-advised to wait for guidance from the WHO on this issue.

Reference

Barr et al. (2010) A new pandemic influenza A(H1N1) genetic variant predominated in the winter 2010 influenza season in Australia, New Zealand and Singapore. Eurosurveillance, 15: 21 October 2010

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Vaccine resistant, more lethal strain of pandemic H1N1?

  1. new successful strains usually don’t originate in Australia
    that vaccine would be a worse match with other strains
    (most) which don’t have those mutations

  2. Who says this strain originated in Australia? Or Singapore or New Zealand? These are the countries which reported it first, not where it originated.

    Consider the possibility that this strain originated in China but was not reported by the government there.

  3. I really don’t think we can predict which substrain will spread in the US ahead of time with any certainty. What we can say is that due to vaccination and the people who have already been infected, the virus is now under selection to escape the immune response. Thus, we are certain to see a new strain become dominant. The strain described in this paper is as good a candidate as any to be that new strain.

  4. ahh, “with any certainty” – you know, how I hate this.

    there is not much diversity around to be selected from
    among mexlu.
    They all descend from that one Jan2009-virus.

    H3N2 is different.

  5. define “dangerous”, define “will” , “more” than what ?
    Anticipating what you might mean … we clearly already
    have that. But then, you certainly know that,
    so I’m confused.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s